3 ms·
I see. The assumption here is that one can simulate intelligence without formalizing the notion of meaning. (And if "meaning" is not defined, then the notion of
by resource0x 4y ago
I see. The assumption here is that one can simulate intelligence without formalizing the notion of meaning. (And if "meaning" is not defined, then the notion of "truth" is impossible to define either). Is my understanding correct?
- int_19h 4y agoThe assumption here is that one can produce useful outputs in this manner. Whether it constitutes "simulating intelligence" is a philosophical question.
- skybrian 4y agoSome people hope that training will cause it to represent meanings somehow. How to represent meaning isn't well understood.