4 ms·

That's such a stupid explanation that it's probably true.

• postalrat 4y ago
  Should anyone care?
  • meepmorp 4y ago
    Maybe
  • eyelidlessness 4y ago
    The person who’s trying to fashion himself a free speech liberator while being a capricious egomaniac who invents transparently post-hoc justifications for his selfish hypocrisy on a platform with world changing impact and expects the same world to just accept his manufactured reality because he’s used to getting his way… yeah, that seems important to me.
• colordrops 4y ago
  It would make sense if they had to scrub logs and emails for legal reasons in the future.
  • Sebb767 4y ago
    IANAL, but Twitter is a private company fully owned by Musk. This might be a publicity disaster, but legally they should be fully in the clear.
    • colordrops 4y ago
      I was going to say "legal or PR reasons" but was too lazy to type it out.
    • consp 4y ago
      Is the spoilation of evidence not evidence of the original issue itself in civil cases?