3 ms·
To look at this from a slightly different perspective: In order to avoid having to hire ~12% more workers, they are requiring all their workers to be on call e
by danaris 4y ago
To look at this from a slightly different perspective:
In order to avoid having to hire ~12% more workers, they are requiring all their workers to be on call effectively constantly, allowing zero paid sick days, and just generally treating the workers they have as if they are machines, to an extent that even the games industry would look at and say "man, that's cruel".
And these people who are massively overworked, constantly overtired, coming to work sick and injured, are the ones who are—sometimes alone—responsible for ensuring that thousands and thousands of tons of metal go speeding along rails that go through some of our biggest cities, sometimes carrying toxic chemicals or fuel oil.
The results of a policy very much like this were on full display nine years ago in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec [0], when half the downtown was destroyed in a terrifying massive fire caused by the derailment of a train carrying crude oil.
This is corporate greed, plain and simple, privatizing profits and socializing costs.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac-Mégantic_rail_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac-Mégantic_rail_disaster
- shagie 4y agoIt absolutely is corporate greed rearing its head here (Railways are some of the most profitable industries in the US). Railways should carry more of the financial weight that will cut into the profits. It should also be easier to hire people who want to work in these positions and staff beyond so that there is slack in the schedule and allow people to call in sick. However note that in industry where there is slack and a relaxing of licensure, this represents an attack on the protectionism of jobs that is built into existing contracts to make it harder to fire people. If you don't require licensure or as deep of training in spots, or have slack in the workforce, it becomes easier to fire people and that is something that is difficult for many union contracts to accept.