4 ms·
That's interesting. It seems it's not great at raw calculation, but if you ask it to explain its reasoning, it derives steps from previous results, and arrives
by imiric 4y ago
That's interesting. It seems it's not great at raw calculation, but if you ask it to explain its reasoning, it derives steps from previous results, and arrives at the correct answer. It's similar to the sibling comment about asking it to tell a story.
- jncraton 4y agoCorrect. That concept is the chain of thought (CoT) reasoning that the article discusses.
- hcarvalhoalves 4y agoThis seem to work because in the end it’s a markov chain. So the probability of the next step of a long answer being correct is greater than the probability of jumping to a correct conclusion.