>the most uncharitable interpretations possible The bias and hand wringing about censoring people whom they even admitted hadn't actually broken any rules disc

>the most uncharitable interpretations possible The bias and hand wringing about censoring people whom they even admitted hadn't actually broken any rules disclosed in by Taibbi and Weiss deserved no charity. It was worse than people had imagined. And you're just going to ignore this part? >2) Twitter's censorship was almost 100% aligned with the Dem Party. That's not "moderation". That's "partisan censorship".