3 ms·
I appreciate being principled about ends not justifying the means. But in my experience this principle is not applied universally by people. It's cherry-picked
by dcow 4y ago
I appreciate being principled about ends not justifying the means. But in my experience this principle is not applied universally by people. It's cherry-picked as what amounts to a non-sequitur when deployed in a discussion. Don't get me wrong, I wish it were a universally held and enforced moral principle, but it's not.
Anyway, the reality is that Teslas are safer than any other car on the market right now, despite the scary voodoo tech. So it seems in this case the means are also justified. If auto-pilot and FSD were causing more accidents than humans, we'd be having a different conversation about ends justifying means, I surely agree.
- paulryanrogers 4y ago> Anyway, the reality is that Teslas are safer than any other car on the market right now, despite the scary voodoo tech. What data are you using to conclude that? Safer for Tesla drivers or others near and on roads?