4 ms·
No, the censorship was not at all limited to "stopping direct harm". Unless you redefine harm as "what Twitter owners/management decide is harmful", in which ca
by einpoklum 4y ago
No, the censorship was not at all limited to "stopping direct harm". Unless you redefine harm as "what Twitter owners/management decide is harmful", in which case that's true by-definition.
Classical case in point: https://twitter.com/JulianAssange https://twitter.com/JulianAssange