4 ms·
That is a bad source (vague article and disreputable, biased site). I do not believe such a thing exists in Germany. The claim certainly needs a proper source.
by mafuy 4y ago
That is a bad source (vague article and disreputable, biased site).
I do not believe such a thing exists in Germany. The claim certainly needs a proper source.
- Xylakant 4y agoIs a court case that twitter lost a better source? https://www.lhr-law.de/magazin/social-media-recht/olg-dresden-twitter-darf-accounts-nicht-ohne-ausreichenden-grund-sperren/amp/ https://www.lhr-law.de/magazin/social-media-recht/olg-dresde... It’s not surprising this exists. It’s equivalent to the Hausrecht in the physical world - if you make your place available to the public (a bar, restaurant, supermarket) you no longer can kick out just anyone without cause. You can ban people from entering (or make them leave) for reasons, but those must be non-discriminatory and not arbitrary. “I don’t like you nose/hair/color of your skin” won’t work. “You need to wear shoes or leave.” is likely valid.
- mafuy 4y agoYes.
- cycomanic 4y agoDo you have a source for why this is a "disreputable, biased site"?
- mafuy 4y agoI've asked a lawyer which site to consult. This was a few years ago.