4 ms·
The difference is the censorship used to be in an attempt to stop direct harm. Now it is in an attempt to stop annoying a billionaire.
by fsociety 4y ago
The difference is the censorship used to be in an attempt to stop direct harm. Now it is in an attempt to stop annoying a billionaire.
- einpoklum 4y agoNo, the censorship was not at all limited to "stopping direct harm". Unless you redefine harm as "what Twitter owners/management decide is harmful", in which case that's true by-definition. Classical case in point: https://twitter.com/JulianAssange https://twitter.com/JulianAssange