3 ms·
>>So the stacked Supreme Court issuing absurd rulings is not actually corrupt, but just appears corrupt? People ruling against what you want is not corruption.
by ejb999 4y ago
>>So the stacked Supreme Court issuing absurd rulings is not actually corrupt, but just appears corrupt?
People ruling against what you want is not corruption.
- orhmeh09 4y agoYou’re right, it’s not, so why are you bringing up?
- nawgz 4y agoSure, did I say what I want anywhere? Do you think that a ruling that went 7-2 and 8-1 in the past being reviewed for a third time for some reason that happens to go 6-3 along party lines makes sense in any light besides corruption and "legislating from the bench"? Please discuss.