4 ms·
Public records.
by bestcoder69 4y ago
Public records.
- googlryas 4y agoIt wouldn't be stalking, but widely disseminating even public records could easily be construed as doxxing, which is not accepted on most public, reputable forums.
- cinntaile 4y agoIt's a jet, not a person.
- googlryas 4y agoSo you wouldn't see a problem with someone publishing everywhere your car goes?
- cinntaile 4y agoThat's not a public record, so I fail to see how it's relevant.
- googlryas 4y agoYou drive your car around in public with identifying information on it, anyone can derive a record of its public movements if they were inclined. For example by just following you around on public roads and streaming it, like how paparazzi operate legally.
- cinntaile 4y agoNow you reversed the data collection process, a jet has to transmit this data and this data is public by default. It's a very different situation.
- googlryas 4y agoYou have to transmit your license plate information visually as you drive, so I don't really see the difference. The fact that some data is public doesn't mean shining a spotlight on specific elements easily is an appropriate thing to do.
- cinntaile 4y agoThis is going nowhere, I'm out.
- ssnistfajen 4y agoThe myriad of flight tracking websites are not in violation of any doxxing rules whatsoever. There is no dissemination of public records other than replaying info as-is. The existence of these automated tracking accounts have no effect on Elon's personal safety because any hypothetical bad actor would not need to depend on this singular account on a singular platform to obtain such information.
- bestcoder69 4y agoElonJet is unbanned on all other platforms. So, no, you couldn't be more wrong.
- igorkraw 4y agoPublic records are public records, doubly so if they concern billionaires. Musk has been begging to be a public person for decades now, he does not get to decide the framing
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]