3 ms·
There is another issue here as well that isn't being considered. If you look at the 2010 Financial Report that lists contributors there are a few foundations t
by larrys 15y ago
There is another issue here as well that isn't being considered.
If you look at the 2010 Financial Report that lists contributors there are a few foundations that give wikimedia more than 1 million. And there are 6 that give between 100,000 and 999,999. And then even more that give other varying amounts. As well as obviously individuals.
That's money that isn't going to other non-profits and potentially non-profits that wouldn't be able to sell advertising and raise money that way. They can only rely on donations and foundation money to support their cause.
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Financial_reports#2011.E2.80.932012_fiscal_year https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Financial_reports#2011....
(pdf:)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/common/4/48/WMF_AR11_SHIP_spreads_15dec11_72dpi.pdf https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/common/4/48/WMF_AR11_...
- gerggerg 15y agoWow, so Wikipedia is being greedy by not putting ads on their pages?
- larrys 15y agoI wouldn't say greedy is the right word. But they are disadvantaging another charity simply because they like the look and feel of their community being free from advertising. Maybe selfish is a better way to put it.