I'm not going to justify this action, I think he's in the wrong, but if the only speech he's suppressing is people making fun of him I don't care that much. Hyp

I'm not going to justify this action, I think he's in the wrong, but if the only speech he's suppressing is people making fun of him I don't care that much. Hypocrite, sure, but I'm more worried about the project Matt Taibbi lays out in pt 3 of the twitter files: > Before the Capitol riots, the company was engaged in an inherently insane/impossible project, trying to create an ever-expanding, ostensibly rational set of rules to regulate every conceivable speech situation that might arise between human beings. > This project was preposterous, yet its leaders were unable to see this, having become infected with the firm’s groupthink, coming to believe – sincerely – that it was their responsibility to control, as much as possible, what people could talk about, how often, and with whom. ^ THAT, is the kind of policy I'm worried about.