3 ms·
I gave the definition but I'll write it slightly differently if it wasn't clear before. Speech is free when the consequences are: - it is not listened to - it
by brigandish 4y ago
I gave the definition but I'll write it slightly differently if it wasn't clear before. Speech is free when the consequences are:
- it is not listened to
- it is listened to
- there is speech in return to the speaker
- ceejayoz 4y agoIf you consider boycotts and being shunned by your social circle "speech in return", I suppose we agree. I'd tend to consider those to be consequences of free speech, though.
- yencabulator 4y agoYou can use your free speech to tell others not to do business with X. When enough people are convinced by that, it's a boycott.
- brigandish 4y agoThe part of free speech that is always in question is the free part. Hence, consequences, in this context, are linked to what affects that freedom, otherwise they're just part of being in a reality where everything is caused and hence has consequences. Thus, calling my dog back and it runs to me is not a consequence of free speech in the way we're discussing it. Boycotts are based on the freedom to buy what one wants, but when they are mandated then they're not. They can be used to try and stop someone speaking, then they're against free speech. If they're not used in that way then fine. Being shunned is not being spoken to or listened to which is freedom of speech.