3 ms·
It is in his personal interest. That seems like a reason someone would do something.
by emodendroket 4y ago
It is in his personal interest. That seems like a reason someone would do something.
- SV_BubbleTime 4y agoIs it not his company? Is he under obligation to not change his mind? I'm not saying he is right - he isn't. I just wish people could put their arrogance aside for ONE SECOND, and realize, they would do the same thing. It's the immature hypocrisy I don't like. That when it was the FBI and DNI having weekly meetings with high level Twitter staff or taking requests from sitting politicians or active campaigns on what political enemies to censor - that was fine because "it's a public company and they could do what they want". I want emotional and intellectual honesty. It's beyond rare though.
- emodendroket 4y agoIt seems like these are a bunch of scattershot points that don’t add up to a cohesive argument. On top of this, “answer for this other thing someone I’ve decided to associate with you said” is one of my least favorite debate techniques.
- penultimatename 4y agoHe's not to blame for being hypocritical, the ones to blame are the people are being hypocritical because they'd be just as hypocritical as he is. Mental gymnastics gold medalist.