4 ms·

> The Biden family tried to get what is effectively revenge porn taken down from Twitter before he was elected. I don't understand why this gets so oft repeate

> The Biden family tried to get what is effectively revenge porn taken down from Twitter before he was elected. I don't understand why this gets so oft repeated. The Post article (https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/ https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden...) contains nothing resembling porn. There are some pictures of Hunter with a crack pipe, but that's not even a revelation. We already knew he had a drug problem. What is a revelation is what could be official corruption, where Hunter gets paid exorbitant salaries to hold jobs he's not at all qualified for, and then funnels a portion of that money on to Joe. There's a possibility of quid pro quo that needs to be taken seriously and investigated further. The evidence here is at least as strong as Whitewater and Russian collusion, and we appointed special prosecutors to investigate those. We should do the same here. Who else could be "the big guy" that Hunter is to hold 10% for?

xadhominemx 4y ago
You’re talking about the contents of the laptop. Everyone else is talking about the tweets the Biden campaign asked Twitter to remove. The Biden campaign did not ask Twitter to remove all content regarding the laptop, they asked Twitter to remove a few specific tweets which contained pornographic images of Hunter Biden non-consensually posted to the internet.
- adamsb6 4y ago
  Who is providing this information on the content of the tweets that were asked to be removed? We don't have a comprehensive list of tweets the campaign and the DNC forwarded. I looked at archive.org for the tweets linked here: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 2 of these include Hunter nudity, one is a video that doesn't play, one was never archived. One, from GuySquiggs, is a Hunter photo with the nudity mspainted out, but questioning the age of the woman in the photo. Also, is that a legal use of campaign funds to have staffers try to scrub the candidate's son's nudes from Twitter?
  - xadhominemx 4y ago
    The “reporting” from Taibbi didn’t say anything about the content of the tweets. Other people discovered we can see 2 of the 4 tweets, and both of those are Hunter Biden nudes (one of which is censored). You’re the one saying the Biden campaign was trying to take down tweets about official corruption. Where is your evidence?
    - adamsb6 4y ago
      Yeah, I conflated the Post story suppression and the takedown requests. I'm also not making any claim about the contents of taken down tweets aside from the ones I was able to see on archive.org. Those are just 3 tweets of 5 that were requested to be taken down by "the Biden team." AFAIK we haven't been given any links to tweets that the DNC requested to be taken down. The Twitter Files also says that the Trump White House made some takedown requests. Excepting actually illegal content like CSAM, any such request would be government censorship.

xadhominemx 4y ago

You’re talking about the contents of the laptop. Everyone else is talking about the tweets the Biden campaign asked Twitter to remove. The Biden campaign did not ask Twitter to remove all content regarding the laptop, they asked Twitter to remove a few specific tweets which contained pornographic images of Hunter Biden non-consensually posted to the internet.

adamsb6 4y ago
Who is providing this information on the content of the tweets that were asked to be removed? We don't have a comprehensive list of tweets the campaign and the DNC forwarded. I looked at archive.org for the tweets linked here: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 2 of these include Hunter nudity, one is a video that doesn't play, one was never archived. One, from GuySquiggs, is a Hunter photo with the nudity mspainted out, but questioning the age of the woman in the photo. Also, is that a legal use of campaign funds to have staffers try to scrub the candidate's son's nudes from Twitter?
- xadhominemx 4y ago
  The “reporting” from Taibbi didn’t say anything about the content of the tweets. Other people discovered we can see 2 of the 4 tweets, and both of those are Hunter Biden nudes (one of which is censored). You’re the one saying the Biden campaign was trying to take down tweets about official corruption. Where is your evidence?
  - adamsb6 4y ago
    Yeah, I conflated the Post story suppression and the takedown requests. I'm also not making any claim about the contents of taken down tweets aside from the ones I was able to see on archive.org. Those are just 3 tweets of 5 that were requested to be taken down by "the Biden team." AFAIK we haven't been given any links to tweets that the DNC requested to be taken down. The Twitter Files also says that the Trump White House made some takedown requests. Excepting actually illegal content like CSAM, any such request would be government censorship.