3 ms·
Open.ai likes to pretend that they are gods who have to strongly moderate what us mere mortals can play with. In reality it looks like a C list celebrity reque
by Workaccount2 4y ago
Open.ai likes to pretend that they are gods who have to strongly moderate what us mere mortals can play with.
In reality it looks like a C list celebrity requesting sniper cover and personal bodyguards to show up at an event. Like dude, you're not that important.
- seanw444 4y agoThis is what happens when only one person/group is pushing the boundaries of a field like this. They get to dictate how it's allowed to function based on their arbitrary standard of morality. Anyone who disagrees, well... sucks for you.
- Workaccount2 4y agoI don't think it matters much. Within a year or so there will likely be an actual open implementation that is close enough to open AIs products. They made dalle2 with a ton of safeguards, but then stable diffusion came along (and now unstable diffusion).
- mike_hearn 4y agoMaybe? There's already open source LLMs like Facebook's OPT but they aren't as good. The cost of training and running ChatGPT is going to be higher than image generation nets. And it's not really clear why companies like Stability pay so much and give it away for free anyway, it seems hard to understand the business model there. We can't assume there will be high quality LLMs always available without extra filtering.
- randyrand 4y agoThere are thankfully a ton of people working in AI. People will create free versions.
- burnished 4y agoWhat about it stands out as an arbitrary morality? I haven’t played around with it myself yet but the bits I’ve seen seem to suggest pretty sane/tame/normal safeguards?