5 ms·
SBF: "I seriously fucked up." Also SBF: "Why won't the bankruptcy team listen to me and take my advice?"
by jasonhansel 4y ago
SBF: "I seriously fucked up."
Also SBF: "Why won't the bankruptcy team listen to me and take my advice?"
- cxr 4y agoPlease don't post these sorts of low-effort comments or use manufactured quotes. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13602947 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13602947> <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15892014 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15892014>
- moralestapia 4y agoThe "f*cked up" quote comes straight from the document, though. I was about to comment on how delusional SBF must be to be this deep in trouble and not snap out back out to reality, leaving aside that "edgy teenager" or whatever mien he's been exhibiting. Is he actually aware of his situation? Perhaps the move to Fox Hill will help him come to terms with what he's done.
- _zoltan_ 4y agowhy the star? Can't you write fucked like an adult?
- ChainOfFools 4y agonot OP, but some auto complete systems (esp smartphone STT) insert these and you may not catch it before pressing submit
- jcranmer 4y agoThe testimony literally begins: > I would like to start by formally stating, under oath: > I fucked up. The second quote is a pretty apt summary of what feels like roughly half the document (I didn't specifically count pages)--there's a lot of criticism of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy team, especially that he felt they were ignoring the offers he had received to keep FTX alive. Indeed, to the extent that it's a misrepresentation of the testimony, it's because it doesn't refer to another key focus of the testimony "it was actually CZ's fault!"
- cxr 4y agoDear HN: I am aware that "I fucked up" is a direct quote. The latter statement is not. Don't feign quotes from people if what you're dealing in is not actually a quote. This isn't hard. And nothing changes the part where the parent comment is a low-effort, Twitter-tier, bandwagon shitpost crafted for lols. It doesn't belong here.
- badrequest 4y agoMaybe you should just recognize it's not your place to police how others express their sentiments?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- cxr 4y agoYou're unable to recognize, apparently, the perverse irony in saying this even while you're saying it. (And you're wrong; it is everyone's responsibility to make sure that the level of discourse on HN meets an acceptable standard. Making up snarky quotes in contravention to requests not to do that—with or without a reminder about doing so—does not satisfy that standard.) * * * * * > make sure you're following HN's guidelines while posting. There has been a drop in comment quality lately. Not cool. > Here's the short version. Good: thoughtful, curious conversation. Bad: snark, fulmination, and flamewar. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34010908 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34010908>
- badrequest 4y ago
- _5uxp 4y agoJust my guess, I think his mind has some deep delusions because of drugs he is using and maybe more.