4 ms·
Since we're talking in present tense that's the remaining 1%. Moon base can be fine with power beamed from a satellite or plain mirrors in orbit, no atmosphere
by rini17 4y ago
Since we're talking in present tense that's the remaining 1%.
Moon base can be fine with power beamed from a satellite or plain mirrors in orbit, no atmosphere in the way. Might end up being still cheaper than hauling nuclear reactor there plus all the infra to reliably dump waste heat from it.
- iso1631 4y ago"Solar and wind power are not sufficient for spacecraft" I guess you're right that solar is useful for 99% of spacecraft -- in that they use it currently. Not a very useful observation "and many other applications" Power in polar regions. How well does Solar work in Antarctica? Or Alaska for that matter?
- moloch-hai 4y agoIt works super-great, collected in the tropics and shipped in chemical form. Before you object to depending on imported liquid fuel, consider that most of the world does already. The main difference is that literally anybody can make it, not just "oil exporting countries" and "fuel refiners". And, will. And export excess production when local tankage is full.
- iso1631 4y agoLast I looked, round-tripping solar via liquid fuel and back to electricity was under 2% before transport costs
- moloch-hai 4y agoMaybe look again without assuming hydrocarbon. Ammonia is a good transport medium, liquid at room temperature under low compression.