5 ms·
To be charitable, it seems as though the Iranian flag was simply made easy to see for Twitter posts. Doesn't seem to have a malicious undertone to it.
by DieBruderBauer 4y ago
To be charitable, it seems as though the Iranian flag was simply made easy to see for Twitter posts. Doesn't seem to have a malicious undertone to it.
- ndsipa_pomu 4y agoThat seems over-charitable to me. It's a very specific change and the article implies that it was intentional >US footballer told CNN on Sunday that it wanted to change the official flag for 24 hours to show “support for the women in Iran fighting for basic human rights” but always planned to go back to the original flag.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- prepend 4y agoIran’s true flag is perfectly easy to see on Twitter, removing words from it is actually harder because people familiar with the flag will be confused. I don’t think the editing was malicious, just stupid.
- tibbydudeza 4y agoThe US flag has too many stars in it - hurts my eyes - let's make it one big star.
- dreen 4y agoAgreed, and make it yellow/gold for better visibility, also remove the blue and the white for better contrast.
- tibbydudeza 4y agoThe "Star Spangled Banner" won't have the same feels anymore :).