> Your inference that rich people using private planes means climate change is overblown is a non-sequitur. Not "rich people," people who are going to climate

> Your inference that rich people using private planes means climate change is overblown is a non-sequitur. Not "rich people," people who are going to climate conferences whose primary purpose is to figure out how to lower carbon emissions and meet C02 goals. It's a perfectly logical conclusion. > Secondly, you are creating a strawman argument. Show me the scientist who is saying what we need to do is to panic? Scientists do not (precisely how I know the fervor is a lie), but there's plenty of "crisis" and "red alert" language which lead to people panicking (see: idiots blocking traffic or gluing their hands to art) [1]. > Third, you make claims about people's motivations being tied to lacking spiritual grounding. Yes. [1] https://phys.org/news/2022-04-page-red-climate.html https://phys.org/news/2022-04-page-red-climate.html