3 ms·
> You were the one who brought up the idea I don't see how this answers my question. It's literally just "does making money on the hardware justify allowing ot
by judge2020 4y ago
> You were the one who brought up the idea
I don't see how this answers my question. It's literally just "does making money on the hardware justify allowing other developers to benefit from your software updates and APIs without paying you?" Because if Apple turns their phone into a console by dropping the price (or even just adding $600 worth of carbon nanotubes to the package) it sounds like you'd still prefer if any developer could make their own app store to get around their 30% fee on purchases.
- stale2002 4y ago> "does making money on the hardware justify allowing other developers to benefit from your software updates and APIs without paying you?" Well the phone belongs to the user. So yes the user should be able to do whatever they want with their own device, including installing other app stores. So anything at all, that you were talking about, about Apple being "owed" anything, just doesnt matter. Lets just ignore Apple being owed anything, because they sold the device and it now belongs to the user. > turns their phone into a console We can worry about the console market once it is a 2 company duopoly, worth trillions of dollars. It is perfectly fine to care more about the phone market, simply because it is larger, more pervasive, and more market centralized. Also, thats whataboutism. Maybe there are problems with the console industry. But regardless of that, it should not stop us from taking action on the much larger phone industry. We can prioritize our actions, to the markets that are the most important, even if you think that other, smaller markets have issues.