3 ms·
Maybe semantics but I don't really think of that as a pole structure anymore. When I think of a pole structure, I think of continuous poles that extend into th
by rsync 4y ago
Maybe semantics but I don't really think of that as a pole structure anymore.
When I think of a pole structure, I think of continuous poles that extend into the ground.
Almost all of your sway strength is dependent on a continuous member going below ground level and most of the economies of a pole structure are realized by not building the footing all the way around.
That said, if you are not bound by seismic it is perfectly reasonable and I agree with you - Brettstapel[1] columns, such as sistered 2x6, would be just fine.
From your link - here is what I would think of as a pole structure:
https://permacolumn.com/products/perma-column-system.html https://permacolumn.com/products/perma-column-system.html
... and we have used that product (Perma-Column) to retrofit one of our barns: 24 reps of jack up, chainsaw off, dig out hole, and insert from below ...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brettstapel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brettstapel
- mikeyouse 4y agoYeah that's fair - most "pole barns" are no longer traditional for the reasons that you point out. They're just boring post-and-beam construction like many other structures have been built for the past 75 years. Especially now with high PSI concrete and engineered steel brackets -- you can get lateral/sheer/racking/lifting strength without digging 10-foot deep holes and fighting 40-foot long posts.