3 ms·
2600 was really limited to its tiny amount of memory. It really limited games to one to a few genres, and at very low resolution. 64 kilobytes of memory was no
by opensores 4y ago
2600 was really limited to its tiny amount of memory. It really limited games to one to a few genres, and at very low resolution.
64 kilobytes of memory was not cheap in the early 80s. But very much worth it. A nice XL/XE demo (of an 800XL using a Unocart A8 adapter) and great Atari channel on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHQaT1Ei28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHQaT1Ei28
https://www.youtube.com/@paulwestphal7336 https://www.youtube.com/@paulwestphal7336