> This just seems like an argument against transparency in research. Sorry if that sounded this way. As I said, "kudos to the researchers". They probably have

> This just seems like an argument against transparency in research. Sorry if that sounded this way. As I said, "kudos to the researchers". They probably have good reasons to be happy, and we can cheer them for that - but the expections for the word "breakthrough" to be used for the layman are not met, sorry.