> Arch was the most stable one On rolling release, it changes all the time, you risk new bugs, but old bugs get fixed. On an LTS distro, it never changes. Th

> Arch was the most stable one On rolling release, it changes all the time, you risk new bugs, but old bugs get fixed. On an LTS distro, it never changes. That also means you're stuck with whatever bugs are there until the next release. Fedora is somewhere in the middle, and I've had some pretty bad luck with updates there, over the years. Like with most things, there are tradeoffs to every decision. I've found using Debian on desktop more fragile because I'm often trying get newer software installed that isn't in the stable repo. Rolling release and the AUR means I don't need to do that with Arch. Flatpaks have also come a long way.