3 ms·
The problem with litigation, even if affordable in the first round, is that it can be appealed and the judgment is only recognized and enforced in the jurisdict
by ebaysucks 15y ago
The problem with litigation, even if affordable in the first round, is that it can be appealed and the judgment is only recognized and enforced in the jurisdiction of the court.
Compare this with low cost arbitration: Internationally recognized, final, binding and a lot of procedural freedom.
Disclosure: I am launching judge.me, a binding internet arbitration service that charges $299 fixed price and offers awards that are recognized and enforced by court systems in 146 countries.
- ars 15y agoWow, way to take a good thing and make it out as a bad thing. You want the ability to appeal. PS. It's cool that you are launching this, and if people want it more power to them and you, but the ability to appeal is important.
- ebaysucks 15y agoIt depends. The lady in this article wants to avoid the army of lawyers on the other side, so a quick resolution for her small claims conflict makes sense. I agree that public policy matters need the right to appeal.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- twakefield 15y agoDidn't Chris Dixon say, "Predicting the future of the Internet is easy: anything it hasn’t yet dramatically transformed, it will." Here's hoping you guys lead the charge on disrupting the legal system.