4 ms·
Well, now we're getting into the theoretical issues. For instance, if we develop wormhole technology, the ship could very well be there before the enemy can se
by j_baker 15y ago
Well, now we're getting into the theoretical issues. For instance, if we develop wormhole technology, the ship could very well be there before the enemy can see it.
Otherwise, I just don't see interstellar space warfare as being that practical if it takes years to launch an attack.
- rbanffy 15y agoIf I could create wormholes at will, I wouldn't traverse the wormhole with the whole ship - just the bombs would suffice.
- _Y_ 15y agoWhy waste bombs. If you can create wormholes at arbitrary locations just teleport piece of a star into a planet.
- rbanffy 15y agoIf I could position both ends arbitrarily, a better approach would be to connect the planetary core with a black hole.
- Locke1689 15y agoIf you can create wormholes at will, you don't need bombs. Put one end of the wormhole in the target and the other in the center of the sun.
- scarmig 15y agoAny guesstimates on how large the wormhole would need to be for it to be a doomsday device? Two estimates, one for a wormhole on the surface of our sun, and the other for its core. I'll try to post my results sometime later. What about a neutron star? It's probably too exotic to consider how a wormhole would interact with a black hole.
- dalke 15y agoThat makes little sense. Do I assume that use of a wormhole circumvents thermodynamics? After all, the sun is in the bottom of a rather large gravity well. It's about 900 MJ/kg from the sun to earth (I think that's measured from the core). A megaton explosion is 4.184 petajoules, so if you could move 5,000 kg from the sun to the earth then it's the same amount of energy you would need to set off a megaton explosion. I don't know how much density is in a 5,000 kg chunk of the sun.