3 ms·
It's the high price and missing features compared to nVidia. The 4080 is a terrible deal, but its RT, DLSS3, ML/compute, etc. makes it a far better option than
by Sakos 4y ago
It's the high price and missing features compared to nVidia. The 4080 is a terrible deal, but its RT, DLSS3, ML/compute, etc. makes it a far better option than the XTX despite costing more. The XTX really should be 200-300 cheaper. I don't know who's going to buy it at its current price when the 4080 is already selling abysmally.
- philliphaydon 4y agoDLSS3 looks horrible. Just stick with DLSS2.
- mmis1000 4y agoHardware supportted frame generation is on AMD cards until the 5xx series. And not many people actually use them. AMD dropped them since the rdna series. And it is suddenly a hot cake now because nvidia introduced dlss3??? It's so confusing from my perspective. In my opinion. Frame generation only looks good when use with texture without too much detail, it looks shitty when use with complex(realistic) textures.
- Gareth321 4y ago> The XTX really should be 200-300 cheaper. The RRP of the XTX is $1000, while the 4080 is $1200. The delta is at least $200, but more once tax is included. Sales tax is 25% here in Europe, so the delta is even higher.
- Sakos 4y agoI don't think we'll see the XTX at a significantly cheaper price here in Europe. And seriously, I don't think a choice between a 1300 or 1500 Euro card is a real choice. It's like choosing between a shit sandwich or a giant douche.
- dhruvdh 4y agoWhat do you mean "4080's ML/Compute"? 4080 is nowhere close to 7900 XTX in flops or bandwidth or VRAM. 4080 is terrible for ML. People need to get over "NVIDIA = AI" hasn't been true for at least a year.