3 ms·
I think that's all correct, except for the Twitter account, which I believe was created by another disgruntled customer (Nathan Stansell) a few months ago, foll
by fjarlq 15y ago
I think that's all correct, except for the Twitter account, which I believe was created by another disgruntled customer (Nathan Stansell) a few months ago, following a similar exchange with Paul Christoforo. It looks like Stansell is now retweeting messages related to the new controversy.
http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service
"2:45 am. Created a Twitter account just so i could Tweet a comment and link to Mr Paul Christoforo at Ocean Marketing.
@OceanMarketting - Am i still one little person out of Millions sir?"
- mkr-hn 15y agoThat was the right account, but it changed. Someone registered the old name and started tweeting stuff. The website was still pulling tweets from the original account a few minutes ago. The new account for the original is https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy
- fjarlq 15y agoOcean Stratagy? How could either of these misspelled Twitter accounts be legit?
- eropple 15y agoThe evidence points to illiteracy.
- danilocampos 15y agoOh, my goodness. A truly funny comment on Hacker News. Thank you for this.
- mkr-hn 15y agoThe original (@oceanmarketting) was linked to the site, including all the tweets from the person who grabbed the name. Then the new one appeared with the same follower/following count, tweets, and profile info as the original. And the original emails had bad spelling.