3 ms·

Do you get paid for this, or do you just hate your grandchildren?

Kuinox 4y ago
Faced by your own lies you keep attacking me personally, curious how you don't even try to deny you lied on purpose. No I'm not getting paid. I'm just a software engineer working in logistics unrelated to the energy sector. I just showed that renewable is more important to you than reducing carbon emissions which shows who cares more about the future here in the conversation.
- Schroedingersat 4y ago
  Being able to find a handful of hours in an exceptional month where adding the amount I said would merely bring the two countries' net fossil fuel consumption roughly equal (using the motivated assumption it would all be much lower height than new projects) rather than bringing Germany's below doesn't prove you right, it proves you're using anything you can find to attack renewables and aren't remotely interested in truth.
  - Kuinox 4y ago
    > Being able to find a handful of hours It was the time I wrote the comment, but it looks like it was "an exceptional month", and "cherrypicked". Of course, today is also cherry picked. You could take today, load factors of renewables are about 8%. Ah sorry, it's an exceptional month ? What about last year ? Well, solar load factor had even lower load factor than this month, with a load factor of 1.5% over the month of december. Wind energy was, opposingly, great and worked with a 50% load factor. The solution you proposed, 400GW of solar, would not have helped. > it proves you're using anything you can find to attack renewables and aren't remotely interested in truth. Arent you bored to take my argument, ignoring it, and repeating it back to me ? At least you could have proposed less stupid solution than 400GW of solar, like 400GW of wind energy, which at least produce useful output in winter. But that would mean you would be informed and we wouldn't had this sad looking discussion.
    - Schroedingersat 4y ago
      Nice demonstration of your interest in truth just making up that I said solar out of whole cloth and running with it.
      - Kuinox 4y ago
        Wind has it's own problem, the wind doesn't always blow as this month show. But claiming 400GW of solar is a solution, is ridiculous. You keep changing your arguments and now you fully switched to Ad hominem attacks. I will stop to respond to this fruitless exchange since you ran out of breadth. Cya in another thread where you will spew your poison there once again.
        Schroedingersat 4y ago
        Still just randomly deciding I said solar?

Faced by your own lies you keep attacking me personally, curious how you don't even try to deny you lied on purpose. No I'm not getting paid. I'm just a software engineer working in logistics unrelated to the energy sector. I just showed that renewable is more important to you than reducing carbon emissions which shows who cares more about the future here in the conversation.

Schroedingersat 4y ago
Being able to find a handful of hours in an exceptional month where adding the amount I said would merely bring the two countries' net fossil fuel consumption roughly equal (using the motivated assumption it would all be much lower height than new projects) rather than bringing Germany's below doesn't prove you right, it proves you're using anything you can find to attack renewables and aren't remotely interested in truth.
- Kuinox 4y ago
  > Being able to find a handful of hours It was the time I wrote the comment, but it looks like it was "an exceptional month", and "cherrypicked". Of course, today is also cherry picked. You could take today, load factors of renewables are about 8%. Ah sorry, it's an exceptional month ? What about last year ? Well, solar load factor had even lower load factor than this month, with a load factor of 1.5% over the month of december. Wind energy was, opposingly, great and worked with a 50% load factor. The solution you proposed, 400GW of solar, would not have helped. > it proves you're using anything you can find to attack renewables and aren't remotely interested in truth. Arent you bored to take my argument, ignoring it, and repeating it back to me ? At least you could have proposed less stupid solution than 400GW of solar, like 400GW of wind energy, which at least produce useful output in winter. But that would mean you would be informed and we wouldn't had this sad looking discussion.
  - Schroedingersat 4y ago
    Nice demonstration of your interest in truth just making up that I said solar out of whole cloth and running with it.
    - Kuinox 4y ago
      Wind has it's own problem, the wind doesn't always blow as this month show. But claiming 400GW of solar is a solution, is ridiculous. You keep changing your arguments and now you fully switched to Ad hominem attacks. I will stop to respond to this fruitless exchange since you ran out of breadth. Cya in another thread where you will spew your poison there once again.
      - Schroedingersat 4y ago
        Still just randomly deciding I said solar?