4 ms·
Same with joomla I guess[1]? What I have done in the past with Joomla 3 has now become Hugo static site only. It is so much better for my use case. No one I kno
by Kelteseth 4y ago
Same with joomla I guess[1]? What I have done in the past with Joomla 3 has now become Hugo static site only. It is so much better for my use case. No one I know needs a full-blown cms. Selling people that they can edit their own website largely fell flat, because they paid me to do it in the end every time. Also, Joomla needed an update every month or so because of security issues was bad because often plugins would randomly break.
[1] https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=DE&q=joomla https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=DE&q=j...
- 2000UltraDeluxe 4y agoJoomla and Drupal both have their strong points, but nowadays most people will just install WordPress with a 1-click installer and add some plugin/theme that does whatever WordPress doesn't do out of the box. It's nothing new and both project will stay alive, although with minimal updates. I mean, phpFusion is still alive after all these years -- just with a much smaller user base. Eventually, I suspect, WordPress will go the same way and we'll have another shiny hammer, that makes every problem look like a nail.
- skoskie 4y agoSince Guttenberg WP has become a complete mess and most devs I know are migrating away from it. It’s definitely on the chopping block.
- yurishimo 4y agoWhile I would argue Drupal may be dying, Joomla is truly dead. I don't know a single remaining Joomla consulting agency that has more than 1 employee. At least full-time Drupal shops are still a thing.