4 ms·

If the charges include manipulating the prices of TerraUSD and Luna earlier in the year - that ironically probably caused the FTX implosion, it's hard how to se

If the charges include manipulating the prices of TerraUSD and Luna earlier in the year - that ironically probably caused the FTX implosion, it's hard how to see Caroline Ellison as head of Alameda wasn't heavily involved in major criminal activities. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/07/business/ftx-sbf-crypto-market-investigation.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/07/business/ftx-sbf-crypto-m... Getting one of two culpable people to testify against the other and let them off the hook seems a dreadfully lazy approach to prosecution.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
boppo1 4y ago
I suspect she may be leveraging political connections.
- michaelt 4y ago
  It's possible - but politicians don't stick their neck out very far for past donations, it's the prospect of future donations which is important. If you've just got wiped out financially? Unless they can expect donations from your allies, or from your peers in industry who are eager to see you released, they can just stop returning your calls.
hnmullany 4y ago
You don't know her deal yet. She might still be going to prison. (If my copious Law & Order watching is anyway accurate.)
- harambae 4y ago
  Oddly enough, the person with the most insights into SBF/Caroline and prison time is Shkreli... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ivqzyjfHG0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ivqzyjfHG0 he walks through a lot of how the points are calculated.
dragonwriter 4y ago
> Getting one of two culpable people to testify against the other and let them off the hook seems a dreadfully lazy approach to prosecution. You think there are only took culpable parties here?