Somebody quoted further up: > The NYT profiles I've seen is pretty clear that Alameda and FTX were mingling customer funds, that he refused to answer questions

Somebody quoted further up: > The NYT profiles I've seen is pretty clear that Alameda and FTX were mingling customer funds, that he refused to answer questions about the handling of funds, and that he was under investigation. >> But he would offer only limited details about the central questions swirling around him: whether FTX improperly used billions of dollars of customer funds to prop up a trading firm that he also founded, Alameda Research. The Justice Department and the S.E.C. are examining that relationship. OK no quote, but if there's no information why should they quote three repeated "no comments"? If he did not answer the question there's nothing quotable there, that doesn't make it a puff piece. Maybe coinbase has political motivation to call reporting from certain media puff pieces?