2 ms·
The death of passenger rail in the USA is actually really pointless and sad. E.B. White discusses it in one of his essays. He writes it far better than I can, b
by User23 4y ago
The death of passenger rail in the USA is actually really pointless and sad. E.B. White discusses it in one of his essays. He writes it far better than I can, but the gist is that it used to be that every freight train that carried mail, which was virtually all of them going most anywhere, had to hook up passenger cars too. The railroads lobbied to get this requirement dropped insisting that it was so expensive it was putting them out of business. Pure lies, of course.
I've head there is a bit of a relict though. My understanding is that if you own your own passenger car and pay the switching and storage fees, then you can hook onto a train going wherever for a standard rate.
- bcrl 4y agoThe death of rail is sad, period. Watching all the steel for the old rail lines being ripped out of the ground since the 1980s is so short sighted. Obtaining rights of way to rebuild lines will be virtually impossible in the modern world. Well, not impossible, but orders of magnitude more expensive than maintaining existing RoW. Even the large scale removal of twinned tracks has removed capacity that previously existed which makes it difficult for passenger rail to coexist with freight. <sigh>