I really did read it, I just really believe that your biases are clouding your critical thought about this. > invoking deferred block in each caller up the cal

I really did read it, I just really believe that your biases are clouding your critical thought about this. > invoking deferred block in each caller up the call chain back to the root Yes if the caller writes N defers in the same function or across M functions then the code will run N defers. Why is this any different than nesting N loops, in the same function or across M functions? It’ll still run N end of block control flow statements without them being “explicit”. At the end of the day “explicit” typically is really just a replacement for saying “familiar with the previous documentation, don’t change things”. Anyways, that’s all I can put into this conversation. Please just try to consider that you’re conflating familiarity with simplicity and leverage System 2 to really ask yourself if what you’re favoring is valuable to the group or just the NIMBY.