4 ms·
"""My point is simply that if a startup is paying a law firm & that ESPN is paying a law firm then maybe the law firm cares more about ESPN's business in case o
by dextorious 15y ago
"""My point is simply that if a startup is paying a law firm & that ESPN is paying a law firm then maybe the law firm cares more about ESPN's business in case of conflicts."""
That would be a case of mis-representation of your interests, and the lawyer/firm could face serious legal consequences.
"""I do not think that is as unreasonable as your hysterical response makes it out to be."""
You keep using that word, "hysterical". I don't think it means what you think it means.
"""They are not saying "we the firm support SOPA" but they are saying "our lawyer looked at this law for our client and he finds it constitutional though this is not the position of the entire firm." I can understand if you're not disturbed by the latter but I think a simple incentive analysis should make it clear why I'm not the first to argue against sharing law firms with those on the opposite sides of controversial issues facing the court. A simple hypothetical should explain it: ESPN wants SOPA, they get their lawyer to sign a letter which says the law looks fine. Let's say the law threatens the startup's business at the same time, maybe the law firm isn't as likely to write or sign a letter arguing against the law if it means it upsets ESPN. End result, more lawyers at these firms sign on to SOPA and you end up with what appears like considerably more support for that side from the legal community simply b/c bigger clients support the law than those that oppose it."""
Hmm. Not really familiar with how the legal system works, are we?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- htsh 15y agoNo besides the degree, the years working at a legal clinic & the time at a firm, not so familiar. I am definitely not as familiar as an experienced lawyer but I definitely saw enough of that world to know that it is not for me and that I would rather program games. I actually never even bothered getting licensed after school but while in school I was temporarily licensed to practice in IL and even won a couple of actual hearings for actual clients working with the clinic I work with. And i only used the word hysterical once. i think you need to look up the words "keep using." I am happy to have a conversation with you but in order to do so it's necessary that you respond rather than react, you know? Maybe you can try starting with using one or two pairs of quotation marks -- do we really need 3? And I would appreciate it if you want to go ahead and explain to me what i have wrong here. Simply saying that i'm wrong without an explanation is not very useful. I am obviously open to listening to your reasoning. If you'd like to move this offline please email me at the address in my profile. Thanks for reading though -- I really do appreciate it.