> Having followed a lot of the SBF discussion since he keeps giving interviews, The better question is, why is anyone still interviewing him? You're far better

> Having followed a lot of the SBF discussion since he keeps giving interviews, The better question is, why is anyone still interviewing him? You're far better off interviewing a terrorist than a conman - as dangerous as the former may be, they aren't going to talk you to death... Whereas the raison d'etre for a confidence man talking to you is so he can sell you a self-serving line of bullshit. There's literally nothing that SBF says that isn't aimed at the singular purpose of keeping him out of prison. Until he's testifying under oath in a court of law, there's nothing he could say that's worth listening to. We are generally smart enough to not hand a killer a loaded gun, but can't seem to resist handing a fraud and liar a loudspeaker.