3 ms·
I have converged to a single (compound) criterion: "Who are going to be accountable for my professional well-being?" This encodes inside that I have partners
by YouWhy 4y ago
I have converged to a single (compound) criterion:
"Who are going to be accountable for my professional well-being?"
This encodes inside that I have partners in the organization, whose success is associated with mine, and who have at least some of the ingredients to make things work; indeed it also includes the assumption that success is even possible.
As time goes by, I learnt to reject everything besides that - fancy words, supposed interest, money, etc.
- readonthegoapp 4y agothis is interesting. i feel like i could or should use this criterion, but how do you interview someone and find out if they're monsters or not?
- YouWhy 4y agoSorry for the late reply. Optimizing people's professional well-being is a bit akin to engineering: a good practitioner can describe their potential strategies, their relative merits and consequences, and interactively - at least to the first order.