> Which is why it is not engineering. I think using that as a basis for this conclusion is wrong. Software changes a lot because it’s possible and “CHEAP” to d

> Which is why it is not engineering. I think using that as a basis for this conclusion is wrong. Software changes a lot because it’s possible and “CHEAP” to do so compared to engineering in the meat world. This is a business pressure/decision. If companies can easily and cheaply modify bridges arbitrarily, I believe they will; and this wouldn’t have any bearing on whether it’s engineering. > Software that was running space shuttles was famously engineered. This is exactly my point: Most swans are white, doesn’t mean all swans are white.