I'm genuinely curious on this dilemma. I feel like I've read plenty of success stories on both sides. Yet I still see more bootstrapped founders coming out on t

I'm genuinely curious on this dilemma. I feel like I've read plenty of success stories on both sides. Yet I still see more bootstrapped founders coming out on top in terms of take-home pay unless a VC-backed company exits or becomes a unicorn. I actually see a fair amount of VC-backed founders who have unsuccessful companies pivot into seed investing with other people's money. So they still "win" per-say. There's probably someone out there who wrote a blog with the opposite premise and they are both relative.