> If the 100% MC/DC coverage was critical to forks, the companies that fork (there's lots of them!) would have bought it. Again, that's a non-sequitur (or perh

> If the 100% MC/DC coverage was critical to forks, the companies that fork (there's lots of them!) would have bought it. Again, that's a non-sequitur (or perhaps strawman, you can choose), because I wasn't addressing the proprietary test set, merely the comparison between a text editor and a database, which is completely absurd since the tolerance for failures is drastically different.