4 ms·
This paper is specifically about topical application of these compounds. The last paper you read saying it was worse that cigarette smoke sounds like it was abo
by tasty_freeze 4y ago
This paper is specifically about topical application of these compounds. The last paper you read saying it was worse that cigarette smoke sounds like it was about inhalation of burning leaves.
Calling the the authors of the paper liars is a very strong claim that you haven't shown any evidence for.
- sniperjoe360 4y agoI too am calling bullshit, although for different reasons. Take a look at Figure 3A. Is there really that big of a difference between THC and CBD treated vs. not treated images? To me, a seeing person with eyes, no.
- pazimzadeh 4y agoThey didn't claim that there was a statistical difference in 3A. It's with senescent cells at the 48 hour time-point when combined with hydrogen peroxide, that they saw the biggest difference. (3C, on the right)
- sniperjoe360 4y ago3A is a pictoral representation of 3C...I still don't see the difference.
- pazimzadeh 4y agoIn 3C they treated the cells for 5 days, whereas in the other panels it was for 48 hours, no?
- uluyol 4y agohttps://xkcd.com/882/ https://xkcd.com/882/ In a world where no one reproduces results, test enough hypotheses and one is bound to hold.