4 ms·
Solar panels are cheap and batteries are easier to build because they're already taking advantage of economies of scale and aren't in the R&D phase still. The
by BeefWellington 4y ago
Solar panels are cheap and batteries are easier to build because they're already taking advantage of economies of scale and aren't in the R&D phase still.
The viability of fusion has been centered for a long time around getting more power out than you put in and once that marker is met it's viewed as the last giant hurdle in the way. There's still plenty more R&D that needs to be done before it can easily / readily scale though.
It's where nuclear was in the 60s basically. Even if it only ever gets to be comparable to nuclear in terms of costing but with none of the hazardous byproduct, it will come out ahead. When you consider the environmental factors involved in battery production it is pretty clear that fusion at least has the potential to be the cleanest sources of energy. Whether it ultimately gets there is another question.
- rapsey 4y ago> It's where nuclear was in the 60s basically. Plants built in the 70s are still operating. It is nowhere near a decade away.
- BeefWellington 4y agoFair, my statement had an implied "if they cleared this hurdle" attached but I probably should have made it explicit. I do think it'll be a decade or so to go from net gain -> commercial fusion reactors coming online.