3 ms·
I was not aware this could be done remotely explicitly going against settings the user himself has set.
by brainchild-adam 4y ago
I was not aware this could be done remotely explicitly going against settings the user himself has set.
- ratg13 4y agoIt’s a carrier setting, you are merely expressing a preference.
- ddalex 4y agoPhone (call, data) interception is mandated in a lot of countries (i.e. operators have to do it is presented with a judicial mandate) against the wishes of user too. This setting is in the same vein, in order to allow authority controlled public broadcasts.
- TreeRingCounter 4y agoGovernments hijacking infrastructure is not remotely the same as governments hijacking personal devices.
- ddalex 4y agoYou are at mercy of the whims of your local government. You don't like it? Then fight to join the local government.
- TreeRingCounter 4y ago
- ratg13 4y agoThey are not hijacking your personal device. Your personal device is letting you know your carrier does not provide an option for this setting.
- TreeRingCounter 4y ago