4 ms·
Comparable results though everything in FreeBSD is like a gig more for some reasons.
by itvision 4y ago
Comparable results though everything in FreeBSD is like a gig more for some reasons.
- nix23 4y agoIt's a bit a unfair comparison because you have include the ZFS-Arc AND Inact ("buffer" in the other test). Also tested under virtualbox = less drivers, buffer flushed, pipewire linux, pulse-audio freebsd? and so on...it's hard to compare those two test in this way.
- vermaden 4y agoThat depends what you use to measure. At first I used RES column from FreeBSD top(1) command. Here are results for the same desktop environments from other tools: | htop(1) | conky(1) | freecolor(1) ------------+---------+----------+------------- FreeBSD | 112 MB | - - | 157 MB Openbox | 237 MB | 460 MB | 382 MB MATE | 508 MB | 778 MB | 788 MB XFCE | 533 MB | 794 MB | 829 MB helloSystem | 585 MB | - - | 830 MB GNOME | 625 MB | 990 MB | 1000 MB KDE/Plasma | 730 MB | 1659 MB | 1167 MB This table above is also at the end of the blog post. So as You see depending on the used tool you may get REALLY different results while having the same components started. Regards.