3 ms·
Hmm. I can see how my argument came across as anti-correlation. But, my intent was to highlight how unreliable “memory used” is as a metric for how good&usable
by reacharavindh 4y ago
Hmm. I can see how my argument came across as anti-correlation. But, my intent was to highlight how unreliable “memory used” is as a metric for how good&usable a desktop environment is. Not doubting whether xfce could be snappier than KDE while using less resources. It could also be doing far less right?
- fuzzy2 4y ago> But, my intent was to highlight how unreliable “memory used” is as a metric for how good&usable a desktop environment is. I don't think this is what TFA is about at all. It is merely comparing resource usage, I don't see it making any other statements. This is useful if you must decide what to use on a less powerful PC.