9 ms·
The WSJ article I cited says embezzlement is a certainty. Since I cited it 3 comments ago, I have to presume you aren't even acting in good faith. There's US g
by 0xy 4y ago
The WSJ article I cited says embezzlement is a certainty. Since I cited it 3 comments ago, I have to presume you aren't even acting in good faith.
There's US government sources saying theft is a certainty, and you with an opinion that it isn't.
>and had nothing to do with embezzlement or theft
He never said that actually, and US government sources say equipment is lost due to theft, which explains the massive equipment losses.
- qqqwerty 4y agoThe WSJ is paywalled, unlike the source I linked to. How convenient. Regardless, based on the headline it most likely a bunch of arm chair generals speculating about fraud, with no actual evidence. Again, I am not saying fraud and theft doesn't exist. It almost certainly does. But there is no way in hell that is anywhere close to 70%. That is absurd. Maybe 5% at most, and that is just pure speculation, and it this point there are certainly audits and controls in place that will make sure those numbers stay low.