5 ms·

> Wait, I don't know what OWS is because I say it's incoherent and uncoordinated, and you say it's chaotic and anarchic? You expect it to speak with one voice.

by wnight 15y ago

> Wait, I don't know what OWS is because I say it's incoherent and uncoordinated, and you say it's chaotic and anarchic? You expect it to speak with one voice. Even organizations like the Republican party don't consistently speak with one voice and you expect an non-organization to produce a clear and concise mission statement in tv snippet lengths. You're obviously stacking the deck. > Sounds like we agree what OWS is; you just think anarchy and chaos are good things. And again. Many different people are protesting many different issues. It would be ridiculous to try to label them in a simplistic fashion because you'll miss all the nuances. > I'm not so arrogant as to pass moral judgment on people I don't even know. Oh, sorry. Dunno where I'd have gotten that idea from. > another one of those Occupy bums who doesn't work, doesn't pay taxes, and is a net drain on the economy. Oh yeah, that.

philwelch 15y ago
I don't expect OWS to be coherent, I'm just saying it isn't coherent, and any protest movement against SOPA should probably have more organization rather than less. I'm also not calling people murderers because I have political disagreements with them, but that's the difference between you and me.
- wnight 15y ago
  > I don't expect OWS to be coherent, I'm just saying it isn't coherent Oh sure, just that and saying they're literally incoherent with rage. > and any protest movement against SOPA should probably have more organization rather than less. Yes, and OWS isn't a protest movement against SOPA. Did you actually read anything? > I'm also not calling people murderers because I have political disagreements with them, I'm not calling you a murderer, I'm calling you a murderer by proxy, and not because we disagree but because you are one. > but that's the difference between you and me. You're willing to slander every person who has been to OWS and you think I'm accusing you without enough information. Hilarious.
  - philwelch 15y ago
    My remarks that those of us opposed to SOPA should engage in more organized action rather than throwing in with Occupy were in response to this comment: > Maybe all us angry nerds should OCCUPY something. Something big, related to SOPA. Did you forget the context of this thread already? You still haven't explained how I'm a murderer by proxy and you aren't. I'm actually curious as to your rationale. I've never actually voted for anyone who authorized any military action at all; did you think I had? If you voted for almost anyone currently in office, you're a murderer by proxy more than I am. I don't avoid paying taxes, but how would you know whether I did? If you really do make a "comfortable income", either you're evading a lot of taxes or you are far more of a murderer by proxy than I am. I haven't renounced my citizenship and left for a peaceful country--but how would you know if I did? If you stayed and worked in the US, you contributed to the war economy and are a murderer by proxy, likely more so than I. So what gives you the right to call me a murderer by proxy? Because I said something to defend the troops? Does that mean you are by proxy guilty of everything that's happened in the Occupy camps that you defend?
    - wnight 15y ago
      > Did you forget the context of this thread already? Did you forget saying that people joined OWS out of incoherent rage, and defending the troops who actually did join the armed forces to kill innocent people? Who painted racist slogans on munitions, etc? > My remarks that those of us opposed to SOPA should engage in more organized action rather than throwing in with Occupy were in response to this comment: Oh, I see. Your baseless slander of tens of thousands was because someone had said we should join forces with them. No problem then. > You still haven't explained how I'm a murderer by proxy and you aren't. I didn't say I'm not. To the degree that I am, and yes it involves a lot of avoiding taxes, I am trying to stop it. You on the other hand support the troops, etc, and are unwilling to apply your incoherent rage rhetoric to the actual destructive elements of society. For all that you (may not have) voted for any war-mongers, you certainly support the conservative status-quo in your willingness to speak out against Occupy, etc. For instance, you call Occupy members a net drain on society. Perhaps they even are (or rather, the needless police presence is...). But any society pursing a baseless war needs to be drained of its resources before it can use them to kill more innocent people. > So what gives you the right to call me a murderer by proxy? Huh? What gives me the right to call you something? Rather, what do you think removes my right to call you something? > ... but how would you know if I did? You'd have said so. And you wouldn't defend the troops. For instance you'd have commented that the racist motivations they had and the armed forces' willingness to recruit them despite this (because of?) was the reason why you couldn't support them regardless of their superficial motivations such as "justice". > Does that mean you are by proxy guilty of everything that's happened in the Occupy camps that you defend? Did I defend blanket-defend Occupy? That'd be like defending Anonymous or any other non-group. As long as there's one under-cover Scientologist causing trouble I can't speak for them as a group even if the rest were all certified angels.

by wnight 15y ago

philwelch 15y ago

I don't expect OWS to be coherent, I'm just saying it isn't coherent, and any protest movement against SOPA should probably have more organization rather than less. I'm also not calling people murderers because I have political disagreements with them, but that's the difference between you and me.

wnight 15y ago
> I don't expect OWS to be coherent, I'm just saying it isn't coherent Oh sure, just that and saying they're literally incoherent with rage. > and any protest movement against SOPA should probably have more organization rather than less. Yes, and OWS isn't a protest movement against SOPA. Did you actually read anything? > I'm also not calling people murderers because I have political disagreements with them, I'm not calling you a murderer, I'm calling you a murderer by proxy, and not because we disagree but because you are one. > but that's the difference between you and me. You're willing to slander every person who has been to OWS and you think I'm accusing you without enough information. Hilarious.
- philwelch 15y ago
  My remarks that those of us opposed to SOPA should engage in more organized action rather than throwing in with Occupy were in response to this comment: > Maybe all us angry nerds should OCCUPY something. Something big, related to SOPA. Did you forget the context of this thread already? You still haven't explained how I'm a murderer by proxy and you aren't. I'm actually curious as to your rationale. I've never actually voted for anyone who authorized any military action at all; did you think I had? If you voted for almost anyone currently in office, you're a murderer by proxy more than I am. I don't avoid paying taxes, but how would you know whether I did? If you really do make a "comfortable income", either you're evading a lot of taxes or you are far more of a murderer by proxy than I am. I haven't renounced my citizenship and left for a peaceful country--but how would you know if I did? If you stayed and worked in the US, you contributed to the war economy and are a murderer by proxy, likely more so than I. So what gives you the right to call me a murderer by proxy? Because I said something to defend the troops? Does that mean you are by proxy guilty of everything that's happened in the Occupy camps that you defend?
  - wnight 15y ago
    > Did you forget the context of this thread already? Did you forget saying that people joined OWS out of incoherent rage, and defending the troops who actually did join the armed forces to kill innocent people? Who painted racist slogans on munitions, etc? > My remarks that those of us opposed to SOPA should engage in more organized action rather than throwing in with Occupy were in response to this comment: Oh, I see. Your baseless slander of tens of thousands was because someone had said we should join forces with them. No problem then. > You still haven't explained how I'm a murderer by proxy and you aren't. I didn't say I'm not. To the degree that I am, and yes it involves a lot of avoiding taxes, I am trying to stop it. You on the other hand support the troops, etc, and are unwilling to apply your incoherent rage rhetoric to the actual destructive elements of society. For all that you (may not have) voted for any war-mongers, you certainly support the conservative status-quo in your willingness to speak out against Occupy, etc. For instance, you call Occupy members a net drain on society. Perhaps they even are (or rather, the needless police presence is...). But any society pursing a baseless war needs to be drained of its resources before it can use them to kill more innocent people. > So what gives you the right to call me a murderer by proxy? Huh? What gives me the right to call you something? Rather, what do you think removes my right to call you something? > ... but how would you know if I did? You'd have said so. And you wouldn't defend the troops. For instance you'd have commented that the racist motivations they had and the armed forces' willingness to recruit them despite this (because of?) was the reason why you couldn't support them regardless of their superficial motivations such as "justice". > Does that mean you are by proxy guilty of everything that's happened in the Occupy camps that you defend? Did I defend blanket-defend Occupy? That'd be like defending Anonymous or any other non-group. As long as there's one under-cover Scientologist causing trouble I can't speak for them as a group even if the rest were all certified angels.