It matters maybe to CEO's who want to squeeze their own companies in a similar manner. But saying they are running well with the head count down is just not kn

It matters maybe to CEO's who want to squeeze their own companies in a similar manner. But saying they are running well with the head count down is just not known. Are the people who remain all killing themselves to keep everything running? If so that is not sustainable. Are systems running in spite of the down headcount, or really because of all the work done by those long fired? And hate/spam is known to be going up. So they are at least not covering that. He had money to run that company for years at a 4M burn rate but chose not to. He chose to fire people like a petulant child. And illegally in European countries. Hopefully everyone sees it for what it is, he is an embarrassment of a CEO.